Teacher Decisions in Selecting Vocabulary for Instruction to English Language Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30617/dialogues.2.1.3Keywords:
high school, ELL, ESL, second language acquisition, vocabulary instruction, English language learners, vocabulary, achievement gap, instructional practices, language comprehension/developmentAbstract
In response to the paucity of literature on vocabulary instruction among high school-aged English language learners (ELLs), this study used concurrent think-aloud methodology to examine the decisions of high school teachers with little to no experience working with ELLs. Participating teachers were asked to read a sample text, selecting vocabulary they might focus on when working with ELLs in their classes. The results indicated that teacher experience was a key factor in vocabulary selection. Junior teachers in the subject areas focused almost exclusively on local-level comprehension as a rationale for vocabulary selection, whereas senior teachers in the content areas focused on relative word frequency and word formation as criteria for vocabulary selection. Pedagogical implications of the study recommend a focus on productive vocabulary knowledge in addition to receptive vocabulary knowledge, as well as vocabulary instruction integrated across subject areas through collaboration among ESL teachers and their colleagues in the content areas.
References
Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 219-234. doi: 10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2
Austermuehle, D., Kautz, T., & Sprenzel, J. (2007). Improving the knowledge and application of vocabulary within content areas. Unpublished manuscript, Saint Xavier University, Chicago, IL.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bring words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2005). Choosing words to teach. In E. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 207- 222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Bernardo, A. (2002). Language and mathematical problem solving among bilinguals. The Journal of Psychology, 136, 283-297. http://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209604156
Blachowicz, C., Fisher, P., Ogle, D., & Watts-Taffe, S. (2006). Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 524-539. http://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.41.4.5
Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, R. M. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. The Reading Teacher, 61(1), 70-77. http://doi.org/10.1598/rt.61.1.7
Calderón, M., August, D., Slavin, R., Duran, D., Madden, N., & Cheung, A. (2005). Bringing words to life in classroom with English-language learners. In E. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bring research to practice (pp. 115-136). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238. doi: 10.2307/3587951
Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 264-274. http://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.83.2.264
Davies, M. (2008). Corpus of Contemporary American English. Available at: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
Firmender, J., Gavin, K., & McCoach, B. (2014). Examining the relationship between teachers' instructional practices and students' mathematics achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25, 214-236. http://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x14538032
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35, 305-327. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heatley, A., Nation, I.S.P., & Coxhead, A. (2002). Range [Computer software]. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.
Hedrick, W., Harmon, J., Linerode, P. (2004). Teachers' beliefs and practices of vocabulary instruction with social studies textbooks in grades 4-8. Reading Horizons, 45, 103-125.
Johnson, M. D., Acevedo, A., & Mercado, L. (2013). What Vocabulary should we teach? Lexical frequency profiles and lexical diversity in second language writing. Writing and Pedagogy, 5(1), 83-103. http://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v5i1.83
Johnson, M. D., Acevedo, A., & Mercado, L. (2016). Vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary use in L2 writing. TESOL Journal, 7(3), 700-715. http://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.238
Konopak, B.C., & Williams, N.L. (1994). Elementary teachers’ beliefs and decisions about vocabulary learning and instruction. Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 43, 485-495.
Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567-587. http://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567
Laufer, B. & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30.
Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12-25.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is need for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59-82. http://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2014). Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/
Shaw, J., Lyon, E., Stoddart, T., Mosqueda, E., & Menon, P. (2014). Improving science and literacy learning for English language learners: Evidence from a pre-service teacher preparation intervention. The Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 621-643. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9376-6
Weinburgh, M., Silva, C., Horak, K., Smith, J., & Nettles, J. (2014). The intersection of inquire-based science and language: Preparing teachers for ELL classrooms. The Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 519-541. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9389-9
West, M. (1953), A general service list of English words, with semantic frequencies and a supplementary word-list for the writing of popular science and technology. London: Longman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.