Power Swings: From Authoritarian to Collaborative Teaching Assessments

Authors

  • Valerie Sartor University of Akron

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30617/dialogues1.1.6

Keywords:

teacher professional development, intensive English programs, assessment

Abstract

This article, aimed at both the observer and the observed, presents the need for compassionate collaborative assessment strategies. By building rapport between teachers and observers, assessments are viewed positively and genuine changes in teaching can occur. Compassionate observations also help teachers to meet standards while inspiring them to excel in their profession. As the approach discussed in this article involves the assessor and the assessed, K-12 teachers, ESL instructors in IEPs, and administrator/assessors working with ESL teachers will benefit from reading this article. Part One offers a theoretical framework by examining the philosophical issues of vision and ethics as foundations for establishing an inspirational environment that enhances expertise and collaboration between supervisors, teachers, and their peers. Part Two describes ways in which expertise and collaboration can be nurtured among educators. Part Three explains how vision, ethics, expertise, and collaboration apply holistically to collaborative teacher assessment. We offer an assessment example to highlight our method.

Author Biography

Valerie Sartor, University of Akron

Valerie Sartor received her doctorate from the University of New Mexico in 2014. During ther graduate studies (2009-2010)  she accepted an ELF position in Ashgabat, Turkmenstan.  in 2015 she accepted a Fulbright Felllowship to Siberia. Her research  focuses upon identity and language in relation to Indigenous mulilingual youth, teacher training for TESOL instructors, and best practices for language teaching.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-09

How to Cite

Sartor, V. (2017). Power Swings: From Authoritarian to Collaborative Teaching Assessments. Dialogues: An Interdisciplinary Journal of English Language Teaching and Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30617/dialogues1.1.6